Legislative Watch Update - National Reporting Help Wanted!

By Harry Briley, 6/2/2024

This weekend, I updated the status for all watched STATE Bills listed on our TVR website (Click on Legislative) and the current November 2024 Initiatives (Click on Initiatives).   If you hear or see a Bill missing from the page, please send an e-mail to brileyh@comcast.net listing the Bill Number and Title.   There are 500 new Bills to examine.  Want to help?  Look up a summary list here:  https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/ and look for Bills that fit your topical interest,

Do you instead have a passion for NATIONAL legislation that we ought to be writing and calling our Congressional leaders? (Yes, even to our deep blue Senators and Bay Area Congressmen who send me form-letter responses about how much their progressive policies are vastly superior?) If you (or a team of TVR friends) have long-term ability (say for the next eight months), I can create a web page for Bills currently in Congress for you to populate. I will depend upon you or your team to keep that national web page current monthly by sending me the data.

Please check this Legislative Watch page for your personal passion theme for Bills that could use your call or letter TODAY. - All these listed bills were last checked on 6/1/2024.

Harry Briley, TVR Webmaster, Legislative Chair

brileyh@comcast.net

BREAKING UPDATE: President Trump Official Statement on Rigged Biden Trial Verdict / False Conviction in Banana Republic Run, NY Courthouse!

BREAKING UPDATE! OFFICIAL PRESS CONFERENCE TOMORROW MORNING 5/31/24 AT 11:00 A.M. TRUMP TOWER ATRIUM. MAGA2024!

WATCH LIVE BROADCAST HERE: https://rumble.com/v4y7b2t-real-americas-voice-247.html Click link, skip ads or allow commercials to play. Live broadcasting 24/7

source: Truthsocial.com

Official Statement and Sources Below

Statement from President Donald J. Trump on the Rigged Biden Trial Verdict

May 30, 2024 "This was a disgrace. This was a rigged trial by a conflicted judge who was corrupt. It's a rigged trial, a disgrace. They wouldn't give us a venue change. We were at 5% or 6% in this district, in this area. This was a rigged, disgraceful trial. 

 The real verdict is going to be November 5th by the people. And they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here. You have a Soros-backed DA, and the whole thing, we didn't do a thing wrong. 

 I'm a very innocent man, and it's okay, I'm fighting for our country. I'm fighting for our Constitution. Our whole country is being rigged right now. 

 This was done by the Biden administration in order to wound or hurt an opponent, a political opponent. And I think it's just a disgrace. And we'll keep fighting. We'll fight till the end, and we'll win because our country has gone to hell. 

 We don't have the same country anymore. We have a divided mess. We're a nation in decline, serious decline, millions and millions of people pouring into our country right now from prisons and from mental institutions, terrorists, and they're taking over our country. We have a country that's in big trouble. 

 But this was a rigged decision right from Day One. With a conflicted judge who should have never been allowed to try this case. Never. And we will fight for our Constitution. This is long from over. Thank you very much." 

- President Donald J. Trump 

Credits: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/a43d8234-cf8d-4a73-b887-26119ea775ee

Click Video to view full speech to 25,000 South Bronx Trump Supporters South Bronx Speech, President Trump 5/24

Trump Store: https://www.trumpstore.com/

Donate and Volunteer NOW: www.donaldjtrump.com

TVR President Announces Mailchimp Tool

Raquel Brandt, Communications Chair

During the May Dinner Meeting, President Leslie Jones said that after research, our Communications Team will start sending club-wide e-mail using MailChimp.   This first email confirms that TVR switched to Mailchimp today.

MailChimp allows ease of use and readability for our membership. We can create professionally looking emails with full-color web-like features and the ability to reach multiple audiences more effectively. We receive detailed analytics to track of our outreach success, as have thousands of other organizations.  We want to work smarter not harder.

Important MailChimp Tip:  If you are permitted to forward our email:
        (1) remove the “unsubscribe” text from the bottom of the email
        (2) remove the “View in Browser” from the top of the email.
Otherwise, your friend could accidently unsubscribe you from our list if they click on Unsubscribe.   This is true of all organizations that use MailChimp 

June Pre-Meeting Talk by Harry Briley about Web Site 

At the June Dinner Meeting, Harry will present a quick overview at 5:45pm of our web site describing where to find important member-only informat.

 Onward and Upward Friends!

TVR Communications Team,

Raquel Brandt & Harry Briley

1984 Communist Russia Called, It Wants The Khrushchevka Ghettos Back...

PLEASANTON, CA.   SEVERAL HIGH DENSITY – LOW INCOME HOUSING UNITS:  A PLANNED KHRUSHCHEVKA INVASION OF OUR  SINGLE FAMILY HOME NIEGHBORHOODS  

  • ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 

  • ATTACK ON YOUR BACK YARD PRIVACY 

  • MASSIVE INCREASES IN DANGEROUS TRAFFIC 

  • UNSUSTAINABLE GROWTH 

  • UNFUNDED LIABILITES 

  • KHRUSHCHEVKA GHETTO HOUSING COMPOUNDS: Ugly Square Compounds, The structures are drab, dreary, bleak and they all look the same.

VIEW THE PROJECTS MAP HERE:  

https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/our-government/community-development/ 

Remember years ago, our rounds of protesting and resisting Plan Bay Area? Click HERE to watch familiar faces! The Progs said the "sustainable" housing solutions for massive increases of population were high density low-income units that would only include transit oriented focused locations and the so called sustainable housing would only be built along the freeway transportation corridors? At the time, CA was and is still losing millions of makers… Little did you know The Plan was to take the newly created “Sanctuary” state and implode it with the TAKERS! UnSUSTAINABLE mass illegal aliens on the dole looking for free (affordable) housing. Well... we have seen the monstrous high density units the planners call "affordable" low-income just another word for free housing, and you can see these 1984 Communist Russia style ghetto compounds being developed all over the U.S.A. and Europe. These plans are unsustainable they are unfunded liabilities to cities and they do NOTHING for our environment! Now these tyrannical, top down regional ABC agency tentacles of the UN are running wildly out of control, with no checks and balances in our Tri-Valley cities. Our once quaint downtowns of the Tri-Valley that have remained the hub or our small towns, the hub of our quiet suburban lifestyles will now be dominated by ugly, stack and pack monstrosities that will grid-lock our single family neighborhoods, while overlooking our personal, private backyards! Where does this ever end? Unless you get involved NOW, the plan to remake our country using the UN Rewilding Maps will create MEGA 15 Minute Cities in which we will all be foreced (Burn Back Better), into…

 We are asking for your help! PLEASE spread the word and ATTEND the city council, planning, environmental and housing meetings in every city. Fight the MTC and ABAG with attendance and commenting. Comment on Next Door and all Social Media. If you have previous experience fighting these massive developments, come bring your knowledge.

We need more people to organize, one voice is not enough! We need more people to join efforts in the resistance of this insanity. Click HERE to read the update from Connie Cox. You can view all posted civic meetings online at our TVR Calendar of Events. You can also join the Catalyst for Local Control Zoom Meetings HERE with Founder, Susan Kirsch our March 2024 Speaker.

For whatever reason you stay in California, as long as you stay… stay in the fight!

Close All U.S. Military Institutions: Global Governance A Dangerous Road to Tyranny

Globalist groups demand US close military over ‘climate change’

Think tanks funded by Gates, Soros demand US military pay 'climate reparations'

Commentary provided by Phyliss Couper, Tri-Valley Republicans

Recently a report published by the CCP, not the Chinese Communist Party, but the Climate and Community Project and Common Wealth, think tanks funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, have decided to dictate to the rest of us how we must manage “pollution” and “climate change”, including reducing or eliminating our military as a vital factor.

The question arises, how does a country protect its sovereignty and its citizens without a solid military, and how would this equate to “environmental remediation” as the report states? And of course, in this report there’s the ever-constant demand for money.  This group wants $111 billion in a global fund to help countries affected by climate change.  No explanation as to how this would work, who would be in control of this money, and the criteria for selecting which countries would be considered.

The report foolishly suggests the US military should pay $106 billion in “climate reparations,” with the British military contributing $5 billion. At this time, China and India are two of the biggest offenders of world climate issues, but the CCP report makes no financial demands of these two countries for their reparation concept.

On its website, the Climate and Community Project (CCP) notes it is sponsored by the Tides Center, an organization that funnels dark money given to its sister entity, the Tides Foundation.  According to Influence Watch, the Tides Center functions as an incubator for other Left-wing nonprofits such as Black Lives Matter, helping to fundraise, find office space, complete payroll, apply for grants, and other tasks.

The Tides Center in turn is sponsored by a long list of donors which include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the David Rockefeller Fund, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, Google founder Sergey Brin’s Sergey Brin Family Foundation, and many others.

Shutting down the US military is only the latest policy recommendation from the CCP. Earlier this year the organization joined with University of California, Davis to publish a report advocating for a reduction in private car ownership.  The report explains that because electric vehicles (EVs) are built with lithium batteries, the current push to convert 50% of US cars into EVs by 2030 will lead to a lithium shortage.  The high demand for lithium will harm the environment.  Their solution to climate change is a reduction in car ownership will also “ensure transit equity” and “respect indigenous rights.” The report failed to mention whether their plan applies to the elite few as well as the regular folks, and explain just how auto ownership is disrespectful to transit equity or indigenous rights.  This line of thinking brings up another question: if all the natural gas access is eliminated, and the lithium would be scarce, where does that leave everyone?  In my opinion right where the one world globalists want us.  On foot and under one world control, except for the elitists who will have access to gas and electricity for their cars, Lear jets, and mansions because they will be in control.

  The words “climate change” and “pollution” have been hooks for the unsuspecting who honestly want to see these issues corrected, but who trust naively that every article and every organization has the best interests of the general population at heart.  Yet again, another call for the public to research the information and those behind it, before trusting or complying with any of it.

  In my opinion, this type of control destroys freedom to travel, freedom to work in any state, freedom to choose a line of work, freedom to educate one’s children, freedom that only a Republic like America can provide.

Phyllis Couper, of Pleasanton CA, is a Op-Ed Writer / Blogger and Commentator. Phyllis Couper is the First Vice President of Tri-Valley Republicans. Phyllis and husband Rennie are longstanding residents and former small business owners in Pleasanton, CA where they raised their family. Phyllis can be reached at coupclan1962@gmail.com.

The Great Replacement at Auschwitz? Not Long Ago, Not Far Away Auschwitz Exhibit

Who Really Died at Auschwitz?  WHAT Really Died at Auschwitz?

Not Long Ago - Not Far Away, Auschwitz Exhibit - Ronald Reagan Library

2 Part Blog Entry submitted by Gloria Cameron and Raquel Brandt

Here is an interesting perspective! Submitted by TVR Chaplain, Gloria Cameron.

“The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar Rodriguez and published in a Spanish newspaper. It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe, and possibly to the rest of the World.

“I walked down the streets in Barcelona and suddenly discovered a terrible truth: Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a group of people who represented culture, thought, creativity, talent.

We destroyed God’s chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who made great contributions to the world, and thus changed the World.  

The contribution of today’s Jewish people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. Look at any donors’ board at any symphony, art museum, theater, art gallery, science center, etc. You will see many, many, Jewish surnames.

These are the people who were burned. Of the 6,000,000 who died, how many would have grown up to be gifted musicians, doctors, artists, philanthropists? And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the diseases of racism and bigotry, Europe opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts. And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition. We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs. What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.”

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it “offends” the Muslim population which claims it never occurred. It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving in to it. It is now approximately seventy years after the Second World War in Europe ended. This email is being sent as a memorial chain, in memory of the six million Jews, twenty million Russians, ten million Christians, and nineteen-hundred Catholic priests who were murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on and humiliated. Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming The Holocaust to be “a myth,” it is imperative to make sure the world "never forgets."

How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center “NEVER REALLY HAPPENED” because it offends some Muslim in the United States? If our Judeo-Christian heritage is offensive to Muslims, they should pack up and move to Iran, Iraq or some other Muslim country. 

"If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools.” Plato

Click HERE to view article quoted above.

Who coined the modern term Great Replacement? Renaud Camus, Novelist, Author of La Dépossession. Click HERE or HERE for more information.

U.S.A.’s Henry Ford was not alone in his antisemitic actions and beliefs against Jews. He was truly disgraceful. A notorious figure who actively propagated hatred through his work. Not only did Ford shamelessly author the widely distributed pamphlets titled "The International Jew," but he also went so far as to align himself with Hitler and his Nazi Party and Islamo Nazi extremism. Hitler himself exploited Ford's publication, their personal friendship, and even his financial support to further “fuel” Hitler’s terrifying reign of terror. Ford imported the Islamic extremeists into Dearborn which now operates “No Go Zones” and Sharia Law in the Dearborn, MI communities. Extensive Islamic Fascist Sharia propaganda is operated through The Henry Ford College Institute. One cannot overlook the disturbing fact that Hitler bragged about implementing the repugnant policies of the U.S. Democrat's Ku Klux Klan (KKK) operations as examples for his fascist agenda against not only the millions of Jews murdered but also those any who dared oppose his vile regime. Such connections and collaborations should serve as a grave reminder of the darkness that can unfold when pure Godless demonic hatred is allowed to knowingly take place - fester and thrive within society much less, within our Western Civilization.

The Ronald Reagan Library Auschwitz Not Long Ago, Not Far Away Exhibit, was recently visited by The Brandt Family who highly recommends it. You can plan your trip to see the final days of the exhibit extended (by popular demand), at the Ronald Reagan Library. An extraordinary collection of more than 700 original artifacts of immense historic value. No book, no podcast, nor history lesson can prepare you for the impact and power this extraordinary collection of artifacts and video presentations held within this exhibit. Click HERE for links to the exhibit information.  

Non-flash photography permitted.

Non-flash photography permitted.

Non-flash photography permitted

We support strong borders, customs and language. We condemn all antisemitism and any form of racism. All Marxist ideology tactics of division from no borders, divisive race-bait hatred and the destruction of our family units.

God Bless The United States of America!

Repeal the Death Tax…Why We Should Support It. 

Updated 11/06/23

By Phyllis Couper, First Vice President - Tri-Valley Republicans

One Million Plus Signatures Needed!

Most everyone owns a home, and many have children to which they might want to will their property.  Prop 19 that passed in 2020 took this right away. The Death Tax makes it financially impossible for family property inheritance and prices the next generation out of home ownership. It is also the largest property tax increase in California history. 

In March, 2021, a WalletHub study revealed that California ranks 49th out of 50 states in return on investment for the taxes that citizens pay.  California has the highest income tax rate in America, the highest state sales tax rate, and highest gas tax.  Prop 19 is yet another cash cow for the state to collect more tax money. 

The Problems Prop 19 Causes Families

Appears to Be of No Concern To The State

https://youtu.be/M1lgakqeiYY

  Repeal the Death Tax Initiative will restore this constitutional right for property owners, and will be retroactive for those whose properties have already been reassessed. A million plus signatures are needed.  We have four months to accomplish this!  Let’s all help lower each other’s property taxes by gathering Repeal the Death Tax signatures of friends and neighbors.

Please join me in the fight to SAVE California private property ownership and keep home ownership affordable for our next generation!

As of 11-26-23 we have not reached the required 25% threshold, therefore we NEED MORE HELP! The following organizations are fighting side by side for the same cause!

  1. For Californians is sister organization to HJTA with many important supporting organizations. They ENCOURAGE tabling! Call Gina directly at (628) 243-1808 for more information click the blue button.

2. Mail completed petitions to: HJTA 1201 K Street Suite 1030 Sacramento, CA 95814. Please note outside envelope “Petition Enclosed”

Phyllis Couper, of Pleasanton CA, is a Op-Ed Writer / Blogger and Commentator. Phyllis Couper is the First Vice President of Tri-Valley Republicans. Phyllis and husband Rennie are longstanding residents and former small business owners in Pleasanton, CA where they raised their family. Phyllis can be reached at coupclan1962@gmail.com.

Alameda County Republican Party Passes Resolution Supporting the RECALL ALCO DA Pamela Price

Resolution 2023-05A. The Alameda County Republican Party Central Committee, resolved:

Whereas:

  • Violent crime and drug use are major problems in most parts of Alameda County, and

  • Newly elected Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price has explicitly stated her intention to “disrupt the system” by relaxing law enforcement and sentencing of convicted criminals, and

  • District Attorney Price has either fired, put on leave, or transferred as many as twenty-five prosecutors, including many of the top-rank prosecutors capable of handling complex cases, as well as firing two top investigators, this in a department that was already understaffed, and

  • District Attorney Price has created an unhealthy environment in the D.A.'s office, with seasoned attorneys worried about what they say or do in the courtroom or in the office that may end their career, and

  • While it is granted that the epidemic of crime and drug use is a multi-faceted problem that will not be solved merely by longer prison sentences, nevertheless, enforcement of the laws and jail time is an indispensable part of the solution, and

  • District Attorney Price received significant advertisement donations from California Justice and Public Safety PAC, a funding front for George Soros, a billionaire who is trying to reshape American society through his promotion of drug legalization and soft-on-crime District Attorneys across the country.

Therefore:

The Alameda County Republican Party Central Committee endorses the growing movement to recall Pamela Price as Alameda County District Attorney.

Calm Before Storm?

By Harry Briley, TVR Legislative Chair, AD16 Member of Central Committee

 I checked all Senate and Assembly bills of concern on 8/31 night - No real movement in most Bill status since 7/13.   Some passed out of Appropriations for a Third Reading.

 Several dozens of bad bills might get passed at one time. This past nearly two months since 7/13 feels like a calm before a storm of bad bills going to the Governor. Please check the TVR Legislative Page. If you have signed up for the ACGOP website, check there for the color-coded version of this same text. The TVR website strips out the red and green color coding. Otherwise, the two web pages are identical.

Likewise, there has been for months no changes to the Propositions and Initiatives getting anywhere close to appearing on the March 2024 and November 2024 elections. I see several vying for signatures starting in September, but of course, have not yet obtained 25% of the required signatures.

The Neo-Amish Movement: How To Preserve Tradition in a Technological World by Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.com.

This is a two part submission: This article was submitted by Phyliss Couper TVR First Vice President Programs. Harry Briley has written a book review on Amish Peace by Susan Woods Fischer, (Click HERE)

A note from the Editor: “After recently taking an “AI “(Artificial Intelligence) Class conducted by Allan Stevo. It truly is shocking what is brewing in the AI tech world. Follow the World Economic Forum who’s students and alumni are the globalist politicians, economic leaders and leading institutions and corporations running the world’s supply chain as a globalist economy (directly leading us into a Communist China Social Credit Score System) rather than making our country great again through a more prosperous and stronger Free Markets System the world is loosing it’s sovereign nations. It us almost as though Andrew Torba CEO of GAB.COM stepped into this AI class as a fellow inquisitive mind, who joined along to participate in the intellectual discussions resulting from the required reading of several AI books… Enjoy Harry’s book review and the article submitted below by Phyllis Couper. If you enjoyed what you read, we encourage you to reach out to both Phyllis or Harry by emailing trivalleyrepublicans@protonmail.com.

The Neo-Amish Movement: How To Preserve Tradition in a Technological World

by Andrew Torba, CEO, Gab.com

Our third child was born about five weeks ago and we felt it was time to get out of the house and do something fun with the kids before summer passed us by. So we got in the car and headed to Lancaster, PA or as many call it “Amish Country.” Growing up Lancaster was a spot we visited often as kids. I have great memories myself from those visits and wanted to give my kids those same memories this summer. It was also a refreshing and inspiring look at what is possible with a homogenous traditional Christian culture and society.

It’s certainly intriguing to explore alternative lifestyles that choose to limit or reject the adoption of new technologies. The Amish community, known for their simple and self-sustaining way of life, has long fascinated those like me who are seeking a deeper connection with tradition and nature. Many people wrongly believe that the Amish swore off “all technology,” but this couldn’t be further from the truth. The Amish certainly use technology. A wagon is technology. A plow is technology. We may consider these to be “outdated” tech, but they are still technology nonetheless.

These technologies are viewed as practical tools that enhance their self-sufficiency, yet they consciously draw the line at adopting more complex and potentially disruptive advancements. At some point in time a few hundred years ago the Amish decided that they weren’t going to adopt technology beyond its existing state. It’s admirable and honorable that they have been able to hold to this decision, cultural tradition and way of life. I think there’s a lot we can learn from them as we reach a point with technological “progress” now that is going to start eroding our very humanity.

Originating in Europe during the 16th century, the Amish trace their roots back to the Anabaptist movement. Seeking religious freedom and a simpler way of life, the Amish migrated to North America, with the first settlements established in Pennsylvania in the 18th century. Remarkably, the Amish community predates the formation of the United States by several decades, making it one of the oldest communities on the continent.

Contrary to the modern notion of an aging population or declining communities, the Amish are experiencing a remarkable surge in population. In fact the Amish are projected to take over the current US population in 215 years if their growth rate continues on pace. This growth can be attributed to a combination of factors, including a high birth rate, low attrition rates, and a deep sense of community. The Amish population doubles approximately every 20 years, highlighting their resilience and the appeal of their way of life to younger generations.

I often ponder the possibility of a Neo-Amish movement, where individuals embrace a deliberate halt in technological progress beyond a specific point, opting to resist certain advancements in the pursuit of a more balanced existence. This doesn’t mean we all become farmers and get rid of our cars and electricity, but rather that we place a firm line in the sand with technological advancement amidst the rise of the transhumanism agenda.

Drawing inspiration from the Amish way of life, the concept of a Neo-Amish movement emerges. This movement argues for a deliberate halt in technological progress beyond a specific point to ensure the preservation of core human values and prevent potential societal upheaval. The Neo-Amish movement encourages critical evaluation and resistance against technologies perceived as encroaching upon fundamental aspects of human experience, autonomy, and privacy.

Let me give you some examples.

Brain implants and other intrusive technologies that interfere with cognitive or physical functions raise valid ethical questions. Such interventions can undermine the essence of human identity and autonomy. They blur the boundaries between man and machine. By resisting these technologies, a Neo-Amish movement aims to safeguard the distinct human experience and ensure the preservation of individual freedom.

The rise of autonomous vehicles and the potential for them to be controlled entirely by software brings forth many concerns as well. Given the susceptibility of software to hacking and vulnerabilities, many people rightfully question the reliability and safety of autonomous systems. By choosing to opt out of technologies that compromise their security, Neo-Amish adherents can maintain a sense of agency and mitigate the risks associated with technology’s unchecked progress.

The recent emergence of mRNA vaccines has sparked global discussions about their effectiveness and long-term effects. Within the Neo-Amish movement, individuals may choose to resist these vaccines due to concerns about their rapid development and potential unknown consequences. This stance reflects a desire to tread cautiously when it comes to medical advancements, emphasizing the importance of thorough research, informed consent, and a commitment to natural healing methods. This approach is panning out very well for the Amish today with existing vaccines.

“The Amish are a perfect example of a large group of people who are largely unvaccinated,” testified Steve Kirsch to the Pennsylvania State Senate. “You won’t find kids with ADD, with autoimmune disease, with PANDAS, PANS, with epilepsy. You just don’t find any of these chronic diseases in the Amish. The US government has been studying the Amish for decades, but there’s never been a report out to the public. After decades of studying the Amish, there’s no report because the report would be devastating to the narrative. It would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades and saying nothing and burying all the data.”

The Amish community’s story is one of remarkable perseverance, resilience, and unwavering commitment to their principles. As one of the oldest communities in North America, the Amish have not only withstood the test of time but continue to flourish in the modern era. Their rapid population growth and steadfast dedication to their way of life demonstrate that they are more than a historical relic; they are a living testament to the endurance of human values and community bonds.

The idea of a Neo-Amish movement invites contemplation on the role of technology in our lives and prompts us to question the potential consequences of unchecked progress. Many of us are already participating in this movement without even realizing it. While the Amish community provides a foundation for this movement, the Neo-Amish perspective urges us to carefully consider the technologies we adopt and their impact on our humanity, privacy, and autonomy. As society continues to evolve, the exploration of alternative paths, such as the Neo-Amish movement, encourages critical thinking and the pursuit of a balanced coexistence between tradition and progress.

As I’ve written about earlier this year our focus at Gab is on empowering people to speak freely and gain access to information about homesteading, homeschooling, and homemaking. In order to help with this goal we’ve partnered with our friends at Plain Values magazine to syndicate their content on Gab News. In 2012, the Miller family began the Plain Values monthly print magazine stemming from a simple discussion about how to share stories of mission and ministry work with their Amish community. It's a great high quality magazine and I recommend a subscription. We are using the technology we’ve built here at Gab to expand their mission even further and help our community learn about homesteading, homeschooling, and homemaking directly from the people who do it best in the process. 

Similar to the Amish, at Gab we believe technology is tool that can be used to improve real life, not replace it. When technology transforms from a tool into a crutch for real life that’s a problem. We’re not trying to implant computer chips in your brain, get you in a self-driving car, or ship you on a rocket to Mars. We simply want you to speak freely and by doing so come to the realization that you can and will get out of the Matrix, not further into it.

Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Jesus Christ is King

On July 14, the California legislature will recess until 8/14

The legislature is ignoring conservative and traditional parents to pass the most progressive bills in both Assembly and Senate.   They start recess on July 14 hoping in a few weeks that we will forget what they are doing (or have done).  The next step for many of these terrible bills is the Governor’s desk.

 Check out the Legislative Watch web page.  The words “Passed”, “Appropriations”, and “Third reading” signals a bill of the greatest concern.   When the legislators return to work (in unknown weeks), you will have very little time to protest these bills running roughshod over families and traditional values.

 To view the TVR Legislative Watch web page click HERE or type this link into your web browser: https://trivalleyrepublicans.org/legislative

Harry Briley -TVR and ACGOP member: brileyh.weebly.com

A pros and con discussion: 15 Minute Cities and Smart cities

Although long it is a worthy 15 minute read and it is one of which everyone should self-educate.  Those against these concepts are labeled on some-I-net sites as conspiracy theorists.  It is difficult to find a rational discussion of both sides of the issue as one can find in the following article.  What I found missing was reference to how the infrastructure of these cities would be handled such as water distribution and trash pickup services.  Will there be a city transfer station every fifteen minutes apart?  What about hospitals?  One every 15 minutes apart?  And who/what monitors all this?  Would everyone be controlled by the “smart city leaders”?  A lot of questions.  Most scarry is the number of local governments in the US and other countries seriously looking at this concept.  I fear they will paint the eyelashes on the “portrait” before having drawn the face.

Phyllis Couper, Tri-Valley Republicans

From G. Edward Griffin Need to Know News

Climate Lockdowns: The ’15 Minute City’ Is a Quarantine Program for Neighborhoods Youtubevideo.

From: California Political News And Views, June 27, 2023

Are 15 Minute Cities Smart? Or Isolation Camps?

By Thomas Buckley, California Globe,  6/24/23     https://californiaglobe.com/articles/are-15-minute-cities-smart/

The 15-minute city (FMC) – a neat idea, a new way to control the populace, a trendy blip in the public planning industry, a long-term insidious scheme – all, some, or none of these?

One thing is true, a thing that makes millions of people very nervous – you cannot criticize the idea without being called a conspiracy theorist, a misinformation spreader, or – that most dastardly of person – a denier.

If you have questions about the concept, here is what you are already  being called:  https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/28/technology/carlos-moreno-15-minute-cities-conspiracy-theories.html  and https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7g898/walkable-15-minute-cities-con.

As with the gas stove “debate,” any questioning of the latest coolest way to re-organize society is a sign of madness.  This haughty reality-shifting attitude somehow pervades the elites despite the deserved devastation of the public’s trust in its institutions in the wake of the pandemic, the response to which involved lies, half-truths, spin, lies, mistakes, lies, the threat of force, lies, the threat of unemployment, the ordered home confinement, the mass destruction of small businesses, and lies.

All of that should be a bit of a tip-off as to the true intentions of the supporters of the idea, but, that being said, let’s discuss the basics.

The idea essentially is to re-invent the neighborhood idea by trying to ensure that pretty much all of the goods and services a person could ever want are readily available nearby. Jobs, schools,  doctors, and cultural activities are also meant to be easily accessible.  To get to the “15 minute” part, the area would be (based on typical walking speeds) about a square mile or so.

At its heart, the idea harkens back to the village of yore – a place of belonging, simplicity, of knowing your neighbors, of creating a community you can count on in a pinch.

While this may be a key selling point, it cannot be forgotten that for literally hundreds of years people have been purposefully leaving villages to try their hand in the city with its chaos and opportunity, its risks and rewards, and, most importantly, its broadening experiences.  

Cities of course already have neighborhoods that are somewhat similar to FMCs, but they tend to be organized around an activity – a meat packing district, the financial hub, etc. – an ethnicity – Little Italy, Chinatown (sorry, Seattle, I mean the International District,) a socio-economic cluster – the west side of Los Angeles versus the east side of Los Angeles, or even an entertainment activity – Broadway in New York or edgy, anything goes red-light districts like the Tenderloin in San Francisco (NOTE – defining what is happening in the Tenderloin now as entertaining is admittedly a stretch, but before the current stumbling nightmare it was for decades a “rough trade” pleasure zone and one supposes that’s a form of entertainment.)

The idea of the FMC, however, is to eventually smooth these differences and create zone after zone of similarly homogenous neighborhoods throughout a city.  As equity is one of the hallmarks of the concept, it might not be terribly fair to have one FMC be notably richer than another, notable different from any of the others.

How to implement an FMC – short of the bulldozer, anyway – is rather complicated because people tend to already be in places targeted for such modification. Zoning, government incentives, planning regulations, public enticements, or simply declarations by fiat have all been proposed to mold existing neighborhoods into FMCs.

In other words, even proponents know that they will not occur organically and need significant government intervention to even get off the ground (another tip-off as to the true intent behind the push.)

One of the most important aspects is the elimination of the necessity of a personal vehicle. If practically everything a person needs is so close – literally within walking distance – and if everything else that doesn’t fit – stadium, airport, university, massive hospital and/or museum, etc. – can be easily traveled to by public transit, then you do not need and evil, polluting, selfish mobility device?  When FMC ideas are rolled out, they do tend to have rather limited parking options – on purpose – as another “benefit” of them is that they are supposed to better for the environment, more sustainable, more equitable, more whatever woke/equitarian buzzword of the moment you want to use.

Now on to smart cities.

This is a bit simpler because pretty much everything above about FMCs applies except with the added bonus that your neighborhood is watching you at all times.  Using cell phone tracking, defined shopping habits, health information from your smart watch, your social media presence, your credit report, you familial status, your hobbies, your habits, and your opinions, a smart city will figure out everything you need even before you know you need it and encourage you to be an overall better person as it defines better people.

In other words, the definition of a needs-taken-care-of, stay-in-your-house-and-shut-up-or-we-will-take-that-away-from-you Nerfified mere existence.  You know, hell with ice water.

Not every FMC is a smart city, but most smart cities must be (or at least start out as) an FMC.

Smart cities are currently so controversial that even Toronto – central driver of the Great Woke North – abandoned the idea.

But the smart city has its supporters and projects are underway building them from the ground up, bypassing the need to shoehorn the debilitatingly intrusive, soul-crushing tech into places that already exist.

Here’s a somewhat jaundiced look at the giant mirrored line city Neom – 

– a bit more, um, hopeful look at other smart city projects underway.

(NOTE – I chose videos for these links because they really have to be seen to be believed.)

And one of the advantages – or hallucinatorily disturbing problem – of the FMC is that is extremely convertible – once established – into a smart city.

It should be noted that Vehicle Miles Traveled taxes, low-emission zones, and other anti-individual freedom measures can also be used to set the stage for an incremental move to FMC and/or smart cities. 

That could be why protests broke out and why foundations and governments and much of the media is calling the protesters right wing conspiracy theorists and just plain wrong and that such schemes are not at all part of any attempt to modify personal behavior though oppressive regulation (another tip-off.)

In Oxford, England, protestors were told neighborhood travel cordons had nothing to do with the completely separate, no way at all tied together, FMC studies proposed at the same time; especially post-pandemic, with the lies and cudgels and censorship and confinements and lies – people are rightfully calling “bullshit” on such facile pronouncements, hence the tension.

But how would a city like Los Angeles, for example, be FMCed?

Going a step further than Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) – an existing government-funded trend to get people to live near bus lines and train stations – LA activists are pushing things like the VMT pilot program, dropping parking requirements, and incentivizing smaller, presumably rental (you will own nothing and like it) dwelling units to shoehorn the idea into existing neighborhoods.

Here are just a few of the benefits of FMC (lite?) being touted by the Livable Communities Initiative, a near-parody of an LA do-goodery factory:

  • Benefit nearby homeowners and residents with a beautiful walkable street, shops and cafes, and access to transit and bike lanes

  • Give every Angeleno the option of an affordable home without the $8000/year cost and burden of a car

  • Create attainable homeownership opportunities that can help close the racial wealth gap

  • Reverse-engineer displacement by building in high-opportunity neighborhoods that have not built enough housing

  • Address climate change by building car-light infill homes, 48 miles of transit-connected bike lanes, new bus lanes, and 48 miles of new tree canopy

“Building equitably and building near job centers reduces traffic,” LCI chief Jenny Hontz told the LAist. “So it makes life better for everyone and it helps the climate, too.” (Here’s the entire story – the comparison pics are worth the click)

In case you were wondering, the LCI partners with a bevy of the progressive foundational/movement suspects, from Extinction Rebellion to Young Entertainment Activists (again, another tip-off.)

Neighborhood and even city-specific plans are going to be rolled out by the LCI soon, though they already have “standard plans” that include such statements as “…human-scale, beautiful architecture above neighborhood serving retail. Imagine any of our historic main streets and villages – Westwood Village, Main Street and Abbot Kinney, Market St in Inglewood, NoHo Arts District, San Fernando Blvd in Burbank – with housing above the stores – creating small, affordable apartments for seniors, Gen Zers, people who don’t drive, and workers who are forced to spend 30% of their income on a car.”

LCI – as do basic FMC and smart city ideas – emphasize an imposed aesthetic as well – “But what if instead we could create streets with beautiful architecture – nourishing to the residents and the surrounding area? What if we intentionally designed our city? Cities all over the world pre-determine their architecture – it makes cities beautiful (Paris, Boston, Santa Barbara)”

LCI concepts, smart cities, and FMCs are oppressively top-down systems that shift power of ones’ community to the bureaucrat class and intentionally and egregiously ignore same basic facts about how humans act and how a beautiful city like Boston – very very very much not be design – got to be that way.

Another anathema of both smart cities and FMCs is that they need the resident to be the resource that drives them, that their consumer habits to be mined and processed in order to make their existence feasible.  They do not account for variety of thought or even the possibility of taking advantage of a unique local geographical or industrial or cultural benefit – they are mere consumption machines in which the human is the cog.

While natural neighborhoods can be wonderful supportive safe places, unnatural neighborhoods will exacerbate the problems that do occur in more tightly knit communities.  Self-surveillance (if not actual real surveillance) and a sense of trepidation about leaving the comfortable confines can lead to a feeling of isolation from the larger world.  In an FMC, that isolation could be seen as being not organic but ordered from on high, creating a mental box that can dwarf intellectual and emotional growth – in other words, a captive personality.

As we have seen from the Twitter Files and so many other recent (and not so recent) revelations about the Censorship-Industrial complex, the real danger of smart cities and FMCs is the potential for the elimination of freedoms, of options, of differences.

That’s not just censorship of thought, it’s censorship of life.

ACRP Joins National Republican Party in Resolution Against Ranked Choice Voting.

At the May ACRP Meeting our brave delegates joined the National Republicans in a Resolution against Ranked Choice Voting. This is after we have seen first hand the destruction of our freedom of choice with all the voter and election fraud it brings on any county or state that implements it.

TVR is proud to support the ACRP’s resolution as follows:

RESOLVE TO ELIMINATE THE INFERIOR VOTING PROCESS KNOWN AS RANKED-CHOICE VOTING

IN ALAMEDA COUNTY OF CALIFORNIA

WHEREAS, the Republican National Committee (RNC) meeting in Dana Point, California on January 27, 2023 unanimously passed a Resolution: "Officially Oppose Ranked-Choice Voting Across the Country and called on Congress, state legislators, and voters to oppose Ranked-Choice Voting in every locality and level of government and return elections to easier systems that worked for centuries for fair and transparent elections”; and

WHEREAS, the California Republican Party (CAGOP) meeting in Sacramento, California on March 12, 2023 unanimously passed a Resolution, which was authored and submitted to the CAGOP by Mark Zulim, Alameda County Republican Party: “The CAGOP opposes the use of Ranked-Choice Voting in California elections and is committed to increasing voter's confidence in California's election process through easier and transparent systems that worked since California was founded”; and

WHEREAS, Ranked-Choice Voting is now being rejected because it increases election distrust, voter suppression, and disenfranchisement, eliminates the historic political party system, and put elections in the hands of expensive election schemes that increase costs for taxpayers, and depend exclusively on confusing technology and unelected bureaucrats to manage it; and

WHEREAS, after more than a decade the Ranked-Choice Voting experiment has failed nationally causing much voter frustration and disenfranchisement and cannot be ignored any longer and even egregious is the fact it has not fully met the fundamental right of “one-person one-vote” in that a very high rate of what is called “exhausted ballots” and “suspended ballots” are always present, which means many votes are not counted within the final tabulation in determining the winner; and

WHEREAS, hundreds of municipalities and counties nationally, including in California, have wasted millions of dollars to educate the public in how Ranked-Choice Voting works, yet they continue to experience an unacceptable and very high rate of ballot errors again and again, and the full negative effects of voter disenfranchisement caused by the use of Ranked-Choice Voting is immeasurable nationally, including within Alameda County; and

WHEREAS, in California with the most recent fiasco found in the Oakland, Alameda County for the November 8, 2022 races where numerous errors were noted causing several elections after their certification to undergo costly corrections, which included the overturning of the results for the City of Oakland, Oakland Unified School District, District #4 and now costly legal suits are pending; and now

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Alameda County Republican Party of California opposes the use of Ranked-Choice Voting in its Districts and is committed to increasing voter’s confidence in the election process and is committed to work with each municipality, all levels of government, various groups of all parties, and all citizens to: educate, train, and directly oppose inferior voting schemes such as Ranked-Choice Voting.

Submitted by: Mark Zulim, Alternate to Alameda County Republican Party and CAGOP Delegate, on April 24, 2023 (v1)

Judge abused at Stanford say people hoped his daughters would be RAPED

A conservative judge who was heckled at Stanford Law School has claimed student protestors screamed that they hoped his daughters would be raped before the equity dean ambushed him in ‘a staged public shaming’.

Daily Mail

Fifth Circuit Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, 51, was asked to give a speech at the famous law school last week to speak about the circuit’s Court of Appeals by the student chapter of the Federalist Society.

 March 20, 2021

 President Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.

Jenny Martinez, Dean, Stanford Law School

 Dear President and Dean,

 I was terribly upset to read about the indecent actions of some of your students when Judge Stewart Duncan was to speak at your Law School.  I would like to state a few ideas that perhaps will help:

 Students who cross the line of rightful protest should be suspended from school for a determined amount of time, and their parents should be notified as to their child’s behavior and the reason.  Parents may not be aware, or not interested, and have no idea their student is participating in inappropriate activities.  It is the responsibility of the University to inform the parents.  If students want to act like children who need supervision, then they should receive such.  They must earn their respect from adults.

 It is time to stand up to pushy parents who flout their wealth as a reason their student should never be suspended for any reason.  It’s time to stand up to the “law suit” crowd who sue over every little thing.

 It is time to stand up to the Regents who, in my opinion, hide behind the hallowed halls when inappropriate gatherings happen.  They should be front and center speaking to assemblies of students that this type of behavior will result in expulsion from the University.

Students are just older children looking for rules and boundaries.  When there are none from home or school, they become unruly “gangs” feeding off one another’s excitement, and the results are situations like that which happened to Judge Duncan.

 It is easy to throw all one’s anger at the students involved, but the problem stems not from the actual event, but from the leadership of the University, which can support free speech, but should be very clear to the students in word and action, just exactly what is not included in free speech: foul language, insults and threats, throwing things or spray painting on buildings or other objects.  It is my opinion that the University fails in this, and if implemented, more respect would be gained from the students on all levels.

 If we want America to be a country where all our children and their grandchildren can live in peace and prosperity, we must turn the tide of young people running amuck due to lack of caring direction.  These young people are not bad, they are just lost due to lack of direction.

 Most Respectfully,

Mrs. Phyllis Couper